Btw, I know before we could use firebugHighlight class for highlighting element.
On Tuesday, August 9, 2011 11:34:37 AM UTC+1, Jan Honza Odvarko wrote: > > On Aug 9, 7:32 am, Rowno <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, I've recently started learning Firebug extension development to > > make a new extension. From what I understand is that since Firebug 1.8 > > there's now two methods to develop an extension which are the standard > > XUL method and the new AMD method. I've read in various places that in > > Firebug 1.8 the AMD isn't quite ready to move existing extensions to > > yet. What I'm wondering is that since I'm starting a new extension > > from scratch, would be better for me to use the AMD method and save > > refactoring later, or stick to the old XUL method? > In order to properly design AMD style APIs we need feedback from > Firebug extension developers so, you are welcome to start using AMD > and report any problem you have with it! > > There is already on report related to AMD based extensions > http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=4718 > > I have also created HelloAMD example that shows how to use AMD in > extensions > > http://code.google.com/p/fbug/source/browse/#svn%2Fexamples%2Ffirebug1.9%2FHelloAMD > > > You can use it as a skeleton and base your extension on it (only > replace <ext-id> tokens). There is a lot of comments and some links to > other resources. > > Please let me know if you see any problem. > > Honza > > > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/firebug --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
