http://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/docs/current/javadoc-api/org/springframework/http/converter/json/MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter.html#setPrefixJson-boolean-
Yeah, its somewhat common standard.
On Monday, September 1, 2014 9:43:35 PM UTC+3, Simon Lindholm wrote:
>
> We do some forms of such JSON prefix stripping, but not for {}&&. See
> https://github.com/firebug/firebug/blob/master/extension/content/firebug/lib/json.js.
>
> Is "{}&&" a common standard?
>
> Den söndagen den 31:e augusti 2014 kl. 22:25:19 UTC+2 skrev
> [email protected]:
>>
>> Prefixing the JSON string in this manner is used to help prevent JSON
>> Hijacking. The prefix renders the string syntactically invalid as a script
>> so that it cannot be hijacked. However firebug does not seem to be able to
>> evaluate it as JSON neither because firebug isn't creating the JSON tab for
>> these kind of responses. Is this a bug, a feature or a defect?
>>
>> Would it be possible that when the returned JSON has {}&& prefix it would
>> work the same way like it doesn't have it, just cutting it out?
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Firebug" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/firebug/bba4d576-f6d8-4426-b035-8d3da38805c0%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
