I can also just speak for myself, though as Lawrance already stated, 
Firebug will continue to exist and it will be integrated into the Firefox 
built-in devtools. The goal is to adjust their UI to look and work like 
Firebug. Furthermore Firebug 3 uses the Add-on SDK and is already prepared 
for the multi-process Firefox (Electrolysis).
And to correct William's statement: The blog post says Add-on SDK based 
extensions will continue to work as long as they don't access the content 
process directly, i.e. if they are multi-process compatible.

If you are uncertain how Firebug.next works, you can try out a Firebug 3 
alpha:

https://getfirebug.com/releases/firebug/3.0/

(If you are using Firefox Beta, Dev Edition or Nightly, ensure you set 
xpinstall.signatures.required to false to be able to install it.)

Sebastian

On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 6:57:37 AM UTC+2, William Nerini wrote:
>
> These are also the concerns I have. Even with the DeveloperToolbar on 
> Chrome I find its developer tools to be a joke. Same for Firefox's built-in 
> tools. I'm already getting those warnings, as well, for several of the 
> extensions I run, most importantly, PrivacyBadger. 
>
> I've seen the "Firebug.next" comments, but they're obscure, to be kind, 
> and I really need to understand whether I'm going to have to stand still, 
> for a bit, on my browser/tools for development.
>
> I suppose PaleMoon will be my only alternative, as a regular browser user, 
> looking for a flexible, configurable browser, but that doesn't necessarily 
> solve my problems as a developer: I do extensive client-side app 
> development in JavaScript (I'm writing a Virtual Tabletop for Pen and Paper 
> RPGs at the moment, at the moment) and would be dead in the water, using 
> FF's own tools or Chrome's, and Firebug's latest versions have issues under 
> PaleMoon.
>
> This is why I posted here, to hopefully get some clarity on the specifics 
> of Firebug's future and encourage the devs to work to make the latest 
> version of Firebug (PLEASE) to work in PaleMoon.
>
> Thanks for your reply!
>
> [deleted/re-posted to correct stupid typos]
>
> On Sunday, August 23, 2015 at 8:10:40 PM UTC-7, San wrote:
>>
>> They've already said here (if I understand correctly) that the future 
>> Firebug will be built on top of Firefox's own developer tools, rather than 
>> being a completely independent extension. I don't know whether I'll like 
>> the new Firebug or not, but I'm pretty sure it will continue to exist in 
>> some form.
>>
>> I'm not so sanguine about all the other web-devel extensions I use in 
>> Firefox, however. I find it hard to believe that all those extension 
>> developers, almost none of whom have been paid a dime for all their hard 
>> work, will just accept having to throw out all their code and start all 
>> over again. I suspect that most of the power extensions for Firefox-based 
>> devel will cease to exist, and with it my main reason for using Firefox at 
>> all.
>>
>> Also, the Chrome extension environment, which Mozilla will apparently be 
>> adopting (just as they've adopted Chrome's simplified interface, for the 
>> most part) doesn't allow an extension to get down into the guts of the 
>> browser and make major changes. For example, look at the awkward interface 
>> that Chris Pederick was forced to use in Chrome for his great Web Developer 
>> Toolbar, compared to the much more elegant interface that the same 
>> extension has in Firefox. I expect nasty changes like that throughout -- in 
>> the name of "security" Firefox will be less configurable than before -- the 
>> main characteristic distinguishing it from other browsers in the first 
>> place.
>>
>> Already, FF is alerting (in both Mac and Windows) that ColorZilla is "not 
>> verified for use in Firefox," despite its claiming to be signed (and no 
>> response from the developer to inquiries). I think Firebug is probably the 
>> one devel extension that I'm fairly confident *will* continue to work -- 
>> but will it be as good, or hobbled by all Mozilla's new restrictions? And 
>> will Firebug alone be a sufficient reason to stick around?
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 4:43 PM, William Nerini <wne...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Given that, according to this post 
>>> <https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2015/08/21/the-future-of-developing-firefox-add-ons/>,
>>>  
>>> it appears plugins that currently rely on the Add-on SDK  will stop 
>>> functioning, as well as plugins using XUL, XBL and XPCOM. How will this 
>>> impact Firebug? I've looked, briefly at the Firebug.next project, but it's 
>>> not clear that's a response to these announced changes.
>>>
>>> At this time, Firebug is, literally, the *only *reason I still use 
>>> Firefox, and is irreplaceable in my development process; no other browser 
>>> had a tool remotely approaching Firebug's power and flexibility. So I'm 
>>> hoping to get some clarity on where you folks are, given the announced 
>>> changes.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Will
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Firebug" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to firebug+u...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To post to this group, send email to fir...@googlegroups.com.
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/firebug/6277c77a-934a-4fd0-8fcf-833b0dc0fd5b%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/firebug/6277c77a-934a-4fd0-8fcf-833b0dc0fd5b%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Lawrence San
>> Business Writing: Santhology.com
>> Cartoon Stories for Thoughtful People: Sanstudio.com
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Firebug" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to firebug+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to firebug@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/firebug/4ae7eb0a-860c-4b40-86b0-d871388b9c4d%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to