> P.L. Steinbruch wrote:
>
> Since last time,when we discussed this matter,I have a feeling that some
> people post in this list just for free ad.
> I would like to hear from you about the virtues of Bruce Schneier's paper
> other than to advertise Security Professional Services.
Virtues of Bruce Schneier's papers? It sheds some lights on the issue - and
whether you agree or disagree is a matter of personal taste I suppose....
Also I am not trying to sell Security Professional Services! Read the thread
carefully, I started out with naming "guys who really know security" and
that's all what I meant... But, *yes*, most of the times it are Security
Professional Services that can do testing in a *controlled* way!
> I don't desagree about to hire professional services,on the contrary.
> I do desagree about to use fallacious assumptions to justify a
position;this
> is neither correct nor professional.
I am sorry that you see the posting as "using fallacious assumptions to
justify a position", this was not my intention at all. But with you
interpreting it as such and with you doing some further nitpicking on
signature issues, makes me think that maybe you are one of those script
kiddies or a "wannabe a guy who know security".
Please if you want to say something, say something useful, do no just blow
air!
Gr. Arjan
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
