Dear William, Actually, I have set destination restrictions in the netperm-table for all users. Apparently, it works but if some users set http proxy option at browsers in IE or Netscape as firewall internal IP address:80, then all web pages can access regardless our http restriction. Do you know what I mean & can you help me Peter -----��l�l��----- �H���: william.wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> �����: 'Peter' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ���: 1999�~2��11�� PM 12:07 �D��: RE: Gauntlet Firewall http proxy problem >This question is probably unrelated to your question. Are you setting >restrictions based on the destination or source? We'd like to block ActiveX >for all destinations other than Microsoft. > >As for your question, I'm not sure what you mean by Level 3. I've done a >fair amount of configuration of the netperm-table so I might be able to help >if no one else responds. I'd need to know the applicable rules though. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Peter [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 1999 7:41 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Gauntlet Firewall http proxy problem >> >> We have installed Gauntlet Version 4.1 on Solaris machine & we use >> netacl-http instead of http. We have set HTTP restriction to particulars >> hosts by denying some Level 3 destination at netperm-table. Apparently, >> it >> works but if user set http proxy option at browsers as firewall internal >> IP >> address:80 (port 80), then all web pages can access regardless our http >> restriction. >> >> Does anyone can help me? >> >> Peter >> >> >> - >> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with >> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.] - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
