I'd defer from using SKIP since I've heard rumors that Sun is looking for
other server2server VPN solutions. In fact see
http://www.ssh.fi/about/press/release04051999.html for an announcement made
on May 3, '99 about Sun and SSH.
ymmv [1],
C.G.
[1] http://www.netmeg.net/jargon/terms/y.html#ymmv
--
#include <std-disclaimer.cpp>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, May 09, 1999 11:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Q] Firewalls and LAN dialup access
>
>
> You may want to take a look at SKIP. I believe that have
> trial versions
> available.
> http://www.sun.com/security/overview.html
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Does anybody have any experience or pointers on how
> to provide
> > security/protection for an Extranet type of info sharing among
> > different companies, especially against possible internal individual
> > LAN users who (unwillingly or not, including not knowing of IP
> > forwarding being enabled ?!?) use dialup connections to the
> Internet,
> > or a common proxy/socks/direct LAN connection to the Internet, if
> > each LAN "sits" behind a NAT router? I am also interested in
> > pointers to policies spelled out for the member participating in the
> > Extranet, including how-to on identifying such behavior ...
> > TIA,
> > Calin
> > -
> > [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> > "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
