BTW,
Most people rename their admin account anyways, BUT The administrator
account can be locked after bad attempts from a REMOTE host, so you must be
referring to a user at the console, but wait, since you are at that machine
and you have rights to log on locally which has to be granted by someone
with Admin privelages, and they allow you to log on to the server, than that
is operator error???
Are you attempting to block users from an external network, or an internal
one??
This Microsoft bashing is really boring guys, I have not seen one
problem/situation that a person with a decent amount of win/nt experience
could take care of.
CAN WE MOVE ON TO A LESS OPIONATED SUBJECT LIKE RELIGION OR POLITICS PLEASE!
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Markus D�hr
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 1999 4:17 AM
To: 'Brian Steele'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Why not NT?
Importance: High
> Care to elaborate on this "buggy and insecure" RPC thingy?
>
> I thought the security problems with RPC were hotfixed ages ago.
try a
net use \\servername\ipc$ "" /user:""
and you'll get a NULL-connect to your server.
Then use NAT.EXE to guess passwords.
This will work on NT 4.0 SP4. Because the administrator account never gets
locked due to wrong logons, your can go on and on and on...
Just one of them...
--
Markus Doehr
IT Admin
AUBI Baubeschl�ge GmbH
Tel.: +49 6503 917 152
Fax : +49 6503 917 190
e-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MD1139-RIPE
*************************
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]