Rather than add to the garbage on the list, try forwarding complaints to the
point of origin. In this case the message (see full headers below)
originated from <impsat.com.co> and was apparently sent through a
<globecomm.net> account, so a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> would be more likely to put an end to the operation
and would add less clutter to the list...
$ nslookup 200.31.14.214
Name: c3114-214.impsat.com.co
Address: 200.31.14.214
$ whois [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[whois.arin.net]
IMPSAT MEXICO (NETBLK-IMPSAT-ME)IMPSAT-ME 200.31.0.0 -
200.31.31.0
IMPSAT COLOMBIA (NETBLK-LATINONET) LATINONET 200.31.14.0 -
200.31.15.255
$ whois [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[whois.arin.net]
IMPSAT COLOMBIA (NETBLK-LATINONET)
Urbanizacion Ynaquito Alto Calle J lote 52
Bogota,
CO
Netname: LATINONET
Netblock: 200.31.14.0 - 200.31.15.255
Coordinator:
Nicolas, Juan Jose (JJN-ARIN) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+54-1-754-7411 +54-1-961-1824 (FAX) +54-1-754-7480
Domain System inverse mapping provided by:
NS1.IMPSAT.COM.CO 200.31.12.1
NS1.US.IMPSAT.NET 200.31.7.2
---Original Message---
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
..[snip]..
Received: from pop01.globecomm.net (pop01.globecomm.net [206.253.129.185])
by beasley.paix.gnac.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA09063
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 21 Jun 1999 22:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from engineer.com ([200.31.14.214]) by pop01.globecomm.net
(8.9.0/8.8.0) with ESMTP id AAA09866; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 00:27:30 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 23:30:19 -0500
From: Walter =?iso-8859-1?Q?Arg=FCello=20Cort=E9s?=
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Off-Topic
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
$ nslookup 200.31.14.214
Server: localhost
Address: 127.0.0.1
Name: c3114-214.impsat.com.co
Address: 200.31.14.214
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
