On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, Bayard G. Bell wrote: > If you're experienced in something, you might not be interested in > combing through hundreds of e-mails per week reading messages that > reintroduce issues that were discussed only a week before. Consider > that if you try to make a list the way you suggest, the people who have > the answers are the ones who are most likely to be turned off, as they > will rarely learn anything new and what new things they have to learn > will be buried beneath long passages rehearsing well-known information. [ETC.] O.k. I see your point. I'm not trying to force anyone, just suggesting that it's more helpful. If you don't want to then don't. Feel free to ignore me, I don't really care. -- Derek D. Martin | UNIX System Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- RE: Response to hack attempt? Bill Stackpole
- RE: Response to hack attempt? Dave Gillett
- RE: Response to hack attempt? Rabid Wombat
- Re: Response to hack attempt? (bait) Bryan Andersen
- Re: Response to hack attempt? (bait... Rabid Wombat
- Re[2]: Response to hack attempt? Rich Bjorklund
- RE: Response to hack attempt? Derek Martin
- RE: Response to hack attempt? Rabid Wombat
- RE: Response to hack attempt? Carric Dooley
- Re: Response to hack attempt? Bayard G. Bell
- RE: Response to hack attempt? Derek Martin
- RE: Response to hack attempt? Magowan, Richard M. (ITS)
- RE: Response to hack attempt? Derek Martin
- RE: Response to hack attempt? Kent Hundley
- Re: Response to hack attempt? P L STEINBRUCH
- Re: Response to hack attempt? Dave Gillett
- Re: Response to hack attempt? P L STEINBRUCH
- Re: Response to hack attempt? Dave Gillett
- Re: Response to hack attem... P L STEINBRUCH
- RE: Response to hack attempt? Larry Chin
- RE: Response to hack attempt? Ryan Russell
