Oh, I don't doubt in the slightest that many have gone to jail.  I just
doubt that many have gone to TRIAL.  Please note that the results of a
guilty plea are that you go to jail and that may be in a plea bargain.

I hope that your basic tutorial notes that.  Otherwise it is sorely amiss.


-----Original Message-----
From: Carric Dooley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 1999 3:03 PM
To: Meritt, Jim
Cc: 'Derek Martin'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Kevin fits the mold (was RE: trial & charges


I have read papers by two hackers that have been to jail.  One was Agent
Steal, and I have the other paper in some obscure corner on one of myh
PC's.  He got over 4 years.  I'd be happy to send the paper to anyone that
is interested.  IT is a basic tutorial on what to do if you get busted.
=)

Carric Dooley
COM2:Interactive Media
http://www.com2usa.com

On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Meritt, Jim wrote:

> Bet he already knows...
> 
> Full article at
> http://www.thestandard.net/articles/display/0,1449,3907,00.html
> 
>                    Feds on Reported Mitnick
>                  Deal: No Comment 
> 
>                  By Elinor Mills 
> 
>                  An assistant U.S. attorney refused to
>                  comment Friday on reports that Kevin
>                  Mitnick has agreed to plead guilty to
>                  computer hacking charges as part of a plea
>                  bargain. 
> 
>                  The prosecutor, David Schindler, confirmed
>                  that Mitnick's attorney filed a document
>                  under seal this week but wouldn't comment
>                  on its contents. Schindler said no court
>                  hearing had been scheduled "as of now." 
> 
>                  An Associated Press report said Mitnick's
>                  attorney, Donald Randolph, confirmed the
>                  plea bargain. Randolph did not return calls
>                  to his office Thursday and Friday."
> 
> Like I said, plea bargain, no trial.  And since HE said he did something
> wrong...
> I do agree on the unfair treatment, but that was neither the question nor
> the issue at hand.
> 
> I can only think of ONE "hacker" that went to trial, and he was convicted
by
> a jury.
> 
> Jim Meritt, CISSP
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Derek Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 1999 9:05 AM
> To: Meritt, Jim
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: trial & charges
> 
> 
> On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Meritt, Jim wrote:
> 
> > How many have actually made it to trial?  What were the charges?  I
> > understand that in almost every case it is hard to "shut up" the
> > braggard^h^h^h^H^h^h^h^h hacker and a plea bargain is made resulting in
NO
> > trial.
> 
> Tell that to kevin Mitnick. I'm not saying he didn't do anything wrong,
> but depending on who you believe the charges may have been largely trumped
> up and he certainly has been treated unfairly, whatever the case. 
> 
> 
> Derek D. Martin           |  UNIX System Administrator
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] |  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
> 
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

Reply via email to