>My opinion? It probably shouldn't be illegal. But there is virtually no >valid reason a scan should be performed on most sites. The motivation is >usually looking for a way in. As such, it should be responded to by the >administrator. Scanning may not be against the law, but it's also not >against the law for an administrator to call the ISP in question, and apply >heat to get the account cancelled. If scanning is not against the law, then what would be the reason to cancel the account? - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- Re: trial & charges Bill Joynt
- Re: trial & charges Derek Martin
- Re: trial & charges Dave Gillett
- Re: trial & charges Derek Martin
- Re: trial & charges Dave Gillett
- Re: trial & charges Lamb Donald
- Re: trial & charges Matthew G . Harrigan
- RE: trial & charges Myllym�ki Sakari
- Re: trial & charges Paul Howell
- RE: trial & charges Derek Martin
- Re: trial & charges Randall, Mark
- Re: trial & charges Derek Martin
- Re: trial & charges Paul D. Robertson
- Re: trial & charges P L STEINBRUCH
- Re: trial & charges Paul D. Robertson
- Re: trial & charges P L STEINBRUCH
- Re: trial & charges Derek Martin
- Re: trial & charges Paul D. Robertson
- Re: trial & charges Bennett Todd
- Re: trial & charges Paul D. Robertson
- Re: trial & charges Michael H. Warfield
