I asked a Notes Consultant friend of mine about this, his response follows:
 
From: Brad Karrfalt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, August 23, 1999 8:32 AM
Subject: Re: Fwd: Lotus Notes Server.


Everything he is saying is accurate, and in fact the way that he is
proposing doing it is very common.  Notes-to-Notes data encryption
is very strong, efficient, and reliable.  It's one of the foundation
technologies
of Notes in fact.  There is absoultely no benefit that I can see to double
encrypting the data.  Allowing Notes to do the encrypting as part of
the replication process should be much more efficient.
 

 
>X-From_: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Fri Aug 20 21:13:21 1999
>Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 16:08:46 -0400
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pete Goodridge)
>Subject: Lotus Notes Server.
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>     Hello,
>
>        We have a growing number of Lotus Notes users who need remote
>     access.  Currently they are dialing into our old modem bank.  One
>     solution is to use our encrypted VPN and allow them access from the
>     Internet.
>
>        Our Notes Admin guy says Notes uses 128 encryption already, and
>     authenticates.  Therefore we just need to open a port for Notes to the
>     server.  I could open the Notes port to the DMZ and move the Notes
>     server there.  This would save the users the overhead of encrypting
>     twice, since replication over a modem currently takes over an hour.
>
>        The other way is too leave it where it is, and do double
>     encryption.
>
>        Does anyone have any other suggestions, or experience with type of
>     set up.
>
>     THX,
>     Pete Goodridge
>     617-349-2440
>-
>[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
>"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

Reply via email to