No desire receive messages !!!

Thank you ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


----------
De:     W Joel Gridley[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada:        Quarta-feira, 25 de Agosto de 1999 03:07
Para:   David Watson; Firewalls List (E-mail)
Assunto:        Re: FW: DNS ..where to put..DMZ or ...

What RFC covers this 90.0.0.0 network? According to IANA-ARIN, this is a
reserved netblock

(64.0.0.0 - 95.255.255.255). Which RFC talks about it? I have no idea
what they're reserved

for, and doing a search on the range itself gets me nothing but a blank
screen.


Any ideas? Only thing I know is that it ain't covered in RFC 1918
(Internal Netblocks).




At 09:41 AM 8/24/99 -0700, David Watson wrote: 

>>>>

<excerpt>

<smaller>I'm new with Fire Wall security. My superior seems to know more
about it. but after this message I have my doubts. </smaller> 


<smaller>Can anyone help?</smaller> 


<smaller>-----Original Message-----</smaller> 

<smaller>From: XXXXXXXXX</smaller> 

<smaller>Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 1999 9:01 AM</smaller> 

<smaller>To: David Watson</smaller> 

<smaller>Subject: RE: DNS ..where to put..DMZ or ...</smaller> 



<smaller>My suggestion would be to have PCI's DNS point to things that
are going to be in the DMZ (ftp and www).  Then pointers for everything
else should be in a DNS behind the firewall.  Also, we should have NAT
and/or a proxy in or behind the firewall/router.  Finally, all the
internal IP addresses should be private (numbers that cannot be forwarded
on the Internet) such as the 90.0.0.0 to .255 range with a 255.255.255.0
subnet.

</smaller>

<smaller>-----Original Message-----</smaller> 

<smaller>From: David Watson </smaller> 

<smaller>Sent: Monday, August 23, 1999 6:35 PM</smaller> 

<smaller>To: Eric Ford</smaller> 

<smaller>Subject: FW: DNS ..where to put..DMZ or ...</smaller> 


<smaller>Eric I'll forward the replies if you would like</smaller> 


<smaller>-----Original Message-----</smaller> 

<smaller>From: Tally
[<<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]</smaller> 

<smaller>Sent: Monday, August 23, 1999 4:52 PM</smaller> 

<smaller>Subject: DNS ..where to put..DMZ or ...</smaller> 



<smaller>This question has been asked n number of times on</smaller> 

<smaller>this list. but after searching through the archives</smaller> 

<smaller>it has confused us more as there are numerous</smaller> 

<smaller>threads and its difficult to follow multiple</smaller> 

<smaller>threads</smaller> 


<smaller>               I N T E R N E T</smaller> 

<smaller>                      |</smaller> 

<smaller>                    Firewall---Webserver(aka dmz)</smaller> 

<smaller>                      |</smaller> 

<smaller>                 Internal Network</smaller> 


<smaller>A typical set up. The internal network has its own</smaller> 

<smaller>"internal" DNS but the hosts have 10.x.x.x</smaller> 

<smaller>addresses.</smaller> 

<smaller>now the question. where do I place the DNS server.</smaller> 

<smaller>what if I place it on the same host as Webserver on</smaller> 

<smaller>the DMZ. This DNS server would be the name server</smaller> 

<smaller>for the domain hosted by the firewall... correct..</smaller> 

<smaller>?</smaller> 


<smaller>and next , is there a way so that sitting on the</smaller> 

<smaller>web server one could access hosts in the internal</smaller> 

<smaller>network by name... how can this be achieved... ?</smaller> 

<smaller>this is the hard part.</smaller> 


<smaller>thanks and please email me</smaller> 

<smaller>tally</smaller> 


</excerpt><<<<<<<<








Joel Gridley                           "Be the packet."

Network Security/Firewall Specialist

GTE Internetworking, "Powered by BBN."

Burlington, MA
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

Reply via email to