|
I was thinking about private vs. public inet
address space the other day, and it occurred to
me that with all the changing of authority with
domain registrars and ip authorities, that some things
are bound to get fuddled in the near future. For
instance, right now it is the responsibility of the nic
and a couple other core entities to delegate to the
rest of the root-servers crowd not to route the
10.X's, 192.168.X's etc..., and if that
responsibility expands past these few entities (especially seeing
as
how aquisitions are occurring right and left),
there is obvious room for mistakes or confusion. We've all
seen what happens when upstream ISPs fudge the
routing tables, but I wonder what the impact
would be if one of the newcomers decided to
route 10.0.1.X at the same time another one did. I believe
it's possible that
packets could end up on someone else's private net given the appropriate
fudging
scenario. So what I'm wondering is ... among the
firewall list folks, has anyone seen any anomalies
of this nature, and if so, what are the responses
that stateful inspection vs. packet filtering give on
unexpected WAN behavior?
Matt
|
- Re: Reserved Addressing Matthew G. Harrigan
- Re: Reserved Addressing Ryan Russell
- Re: Reserved Addressing Dave Gillett
- Re: Reserved Addressing Paul D. Robertson
- Re: Reserved Addressing Matthew G. Harrigan
- Re: Reserved Addressing Paul D. Robertson
- Re: Reserved Addressing Cliff Skolnick
- Re: Reserved Addressing Ryan Russell
- Re: Reserved Addressing Cliff Skolnick
- Re: Reserved Addressing Ryan Russell
- Re: Reserved Addressing Matthew G. Harrigan
