-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mike (and Bill), you probably set up the NAT to do static one-on-one translation, correct? I have not been able to bring PPTP through a firewall (Tested FW-1) with hiding NAT, using a single NAT'ed IP for multiple LAN IP's. Others, thanks for the infos. I'll check them out. The Nortel Appliance (formerly New Oak) does PPTP, L2F, L2TP and IPSec. After re-reading the RFC for L2TP is appears that it runs over UDP, which means reliability might be a question, but it would pass a proxy. However, I don't want to carry a huge switch together with my laptop when I travel to and on client site ;) The PowerVPN from Axent (formerly AltaVista Tunnel?) seems to run on TCP (Thanks Ron!). I'll give my Axent guy a call tomorrow. Thanks again, Frank > -----Original Message----- > From: Espinola, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 1999 11:48 AM > To: 'Frank Knobbe' > Subject: RE: Looking for TCP based VPN > > Gee, I use MS PPTP through my NAT'd Firewall-1 firewall all > the time. The > TCP port is 1723, IP port 47. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.1 Comment: PGP or S/MIME (X.509) encrypted email preferred iQA/AwUBN9Wi4URKym0LjhFcEQJYXgCcDTv5qfuY3Csf+1RKDkDkRsQ2D4gAnjLr XmbgRAYfLciDkyEb02ejhr8p =+zpY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
