We got the same scan from Japan and one from Washington looks like some UNI students have found a new toy. All scans were trying to hit 210.9.41.4 - 7 (no trace available??) Bennett Samowich wrote: > This may be another newbie question, when "dis-allowing" certain packets > is it better to deny or reject? Why the different actions? > > Thanks > - Bennett > > - > [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
begin:vcard n:Harris;David tel;cell:0417 516 023 tel;fax:61 2 9957 1111 tel;work:61 2 9957 1000 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://securenet.com.au org:Secure Network Solutions adr:;;Level 3, 1 James Place;North Sydney;NSW;2060;Australia version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:IT Security Analyst fn:David Harris end:vcard
