Isn't it about time we just wiped all interleaf addresses
from the list?
I have asked (politely) the interleaf postmaster to forward
the address to be removed to bigmac, but it appears it was
to no avail?
What really baffles me is that the mailer daemon responds,
even though "Precendence: Bulk" is set in the mail. Don't
people ever check what the best current practises are
before writing mail software?
(Dumb question, I know, shoot me)
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: your mail
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 06:59:25 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message to Chan_Cao is being returned to you,
since Chan_Cao is no longer with Interleaf. Please remove their
address from any electronic mail subscriptions. If you feel that
this message was received in error, please contact
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Here is your message:
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 24 06:59:24 1999
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 04:06:51 -0400
From: Mikael Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: EnterNet Sweden AB
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
To: Ryan Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Wagner Brett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IP Spoofing
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mime-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by
beasley.paix.gnac.net id BAB21069185
[BIG SNIP]
---
Mikael Olsson, EnterNet Sweden AB, Box 393, S-891 28 =D6RNSK=D6LDSVIK
Phone: +46-(0)660-105 50 Fax: +46-(0)660-122 50
WWW: http://www.enternet.se E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
