>From what I have read, PIX does not take a noticable performance hit with
NAT enabled. I have not tested this myself.
On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Simon Burson wrote:
> Does anyone have any ideas of the load generated on a cisco pix firewall
> when using address translation to a DMZ.
> There is about 30 machines in the DMZ including mail, web etc...
> Does the address translation require significant CPU or is it insignificant?
> Thanks in advance
>
> -TAZ-
>
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
