The switched environment should not have changed anything, it is hard to say
with you schema. Technically, you have the same broadcast domain unless you
have set up VLANs, I believe then you would need routers to route traffic
between your VLANs.. By adding a switch you just divided your collision
domains. Anybody correct me if I am wrong!
I would look at the default gateways, you may have to add a static route but
I don't believe so.
Another thing, what service pack are you running, have you enabled security
in the TCP/IP properties?
Jean
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tally
> Sent: Saturday, October 09, 1999 5:39 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: NT as a router issues
>
>
>
> I have a issue going on with NT box, which is
> acting
> as a router. It is a Ethernet based LAN.
>
> This is the configuration.
>
> Cisco Router
> |
> |
> Interface 1
> |
> |
> NT BOX
> |
> |
> Interface2
> |
> |
> PC A
>
> From cisco router I can successfully ping Interface
> 1.
> PC A can successfully ping Interface 2. Problem is
> that
> from cisco router i cannot ping Interface 2.
> However
> from PC A i can successfully ping Interface 1 and
> 2.
> Ofcourse IP forwarding has been enabled on the NT
> Box.
>
> I have simplified the configuration for the basic
> issue.
> If anyone would know why the NT Box is behaving
> like this.
> This is a switched environment. I had not faced
> this
> problem earlier when it was a plain HUB
> environment.
>
> Please respond asap as i am pretty much stuck.
>
> thanks
>
>
>
>
> =====
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
