"Parker, Gary W" wrote:
> Retaliation is not the proper response to attacks, real or perceived.
> Remember that you propose to spoof the attacker's address in your response.
> The attack itself could well have been made using a spoofed address, and you
> will in effect be further victimizing someone who is already themselves a
> victim.
I'm not clear on what a port scan accomplishes with a spoofed address
unless it is just to make you think you're being scanned from elsewhere.
If you're being scanned from a spoofed address, then whoever is trying to
find a vulnerability will never know the result, right?
Eric Johnson
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
