Apologies. I screwed up. As Sam James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> graciously pointed out to me in personal e-mail, IP Masq is not a filtering mechanism per se, of course. It is NAT. I wish I had a clever excuse... I dropped the ball and replied without thinking. It probably isn't a permanent problem. :-) Who knows... Fred - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- linux Masq == stateful filtering ? ( NEWBIE ) Luca D'Andrea
- Re: linux Masq == stateful filtering ? ( NEWBIE... Frederick M Avolio
- Re: linux Masq == stateful filtering ? ( NE... Frederick M Avolio
- Re: linux Masq == stateful filtering ? ... Bernd Eckenfels
- Re: linux Masq == stateful filtering ?... Helmut Springer
- Re: linux Masq == stateful filter... Aaron C. Springer
- Re: linux Masq == stateful fi... Ron DuFresne
- Re: linux Masq == statefu... Aaron C. Springer
- Re: linux Masq == statefu... Paul D. Robertson
- Re: linux Masq == stateful fi... Jason Axley
- Re: linux Masq == statefu... Aaron C. Springer
- No Subject Bernd Eckenfels
