Re: Packets not destined for my network -reply

[flynngn]

Chris Brenton wrote:
> 
> I'm digging Cisco's reflexive filters. Simpler rules, maintains state
> and seems to go easy on the CPU. Who needs a firewall. ;)

Chris,

Have you done any performance tests yet? Will they support thousands
or tens of thousands of state-maintained connections?

Also, as I read it, it won't work for anything except simple
protocols (telnet, SMTP, web).

thanks,
gary
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]