Re: Bug in Checkpoint FW-1 3.0 ?

[Ryan Russell]

On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Frederick M Avolio wrote:
> I didn't think I was spreading FUD and didn't go into any more details 
> because they have been discussed over and again many times over the past 5 
> years or so. This is not new.

My call of "FUD" has to do with the wording of your note, which makes it
seem you recommend steering clear of FW-1 (and SPF in general) due to the
recent FTP PASV stuff.  If that problem affects other platforms, then
that's not a reasonable conclusion.

Now, if you have other reasons to steer clear of FW-1 (and perhaps SPF in
general) but didn't state them for brevity, then that may be forgiven. :)
There are plenty of reasons to stay away from FW-1 and many SPF packages
as they exist today.  

                                        Ryan

-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]