"Aaron C. Springer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > as far as I know (which aint much).. > > FW1 "statefull inspection" is the only "filter" that really does what > you say > you want. Actually it's not. I wrote one for Linux that monitors application state much like FW-1 does. b. - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- Free stateful packet filtering Steve George
- RE: Free stateful packet filtering Aaron C. Springer
- Re: Free stateful packet filtering Chris Brenton
- RE: Free stateful packet filtering bmurrell
- RE: Free stateful packet filtering Aaron C. Springer
- RE: Free stateful packet filtering bmurrell
- RE: Free stateful packet filtering Aaron C. Springer
- RE: Free stateful packet filte... bmurrell
- RE: Free stateful packet f... Aaron C. Springer
- RE: Free stateful packet f... bmurrell
- RE: Free stateful packet filtering Ron DuFresne
- Re: Free stateful packet filtering Paul D. Robertson
- Re: Free stateful packet filtering bmurrell
- Re: Free stateful packet filtering Jeff Burson
- Re: Free stateful packet filtering Paul D. Robertson
- Re: Free stateful packet filtering Gary Flynn
