"Paul D. Robertson" wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, R. Michael Williams wrote: > > > >I still happen to hold the opinion that remote display from a > > >hardened OS (preferably one with MAC compartments) is the best > > >answer to all that stuff. Preferably on an OS that doesn't allow > > >Internet-enabled object modules. > > > > Paul, can you expand on this concept for me? It looks interesting but > > it's news to me. TIA. > > the idea is to > run the browser on a machine on the DMZ and export the display back to the > desktop. Sort of like a B2 PDP-11 and VT-100 except with fancier graphics :) - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- RE: Packet Filtering vs. Proxy Ron DuFresne
- RE: Packet Filtering vs. Proxy Ben Nagy
- Re: Packet Filtering vs. Proxy Mikael Olsson
- Re: Packet Filtering vs. Proxy Paul D. Robertson
- Re: Packet Filtering vs. Proxy Mikael Olsson
- Re: Packet Filtering vs. Proxy Paul D. Robertson
- Re: Packet Filtering vs. Proxy Lorens Kockum
- Re: Packet Filtering vs. Pro... Paul D. Robertson
- RE: Packet Filtering vs. Proxy R. Michael Williams
- RE: Packet Filtering vs. Pro... Paul D. Robertson
- Re: Packet Filtering vs. Pro... Gary Flynn
- Re: Packet Filtering vs. Proxy carson
- Re: Packet Filtering vs. Proxy Mikael Olsson
- PC anywhere Chris Mason
- Re: PC anywhere Paul D. Robertson
- Re: PC anywhere Spikeman
- RE: PC anywhere Micheal Espinola Jr
- Re: Packet Filtering vs. Proxy Todd
- RE: Packet Filtering vs. Proxy Jon Earle
- Re: Packet Filtering vs. Proxy Lorens Kockum
- RE: Packet Filtering vs. Proxy bmurrell
