[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I personally would say 139 is a bucket of worms. If you've got it > right open from outside to in, it'll be fun. People can now establish > NetBIOS sessions with your internal computers. But if you only open it > from DMZ to internal, it's a bit more safe. > > As for the other two, I don't know. > Don't look at the specific service running... think about the fact that there are now holes in your firewall. If any of the services running on those ports become susceptible to buffer overflows etc., you've just opened your kimono and begun dancing on National TV. - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- Opening up ports 139, 1494, 1604 - Am I safe? SGriffin
- Re: Opening up ports 139, 1494, 1604 - Am I safe? D Clyde Williamson
- Re: Opening up ports 139, 1494, 1604 - Am I safe? damian
- Re: Opening up ports 139, 1494, 1604 - Am I sa... D Clyde Williamson
- Re: Opening up ports 139, 1494, 1604 - Am I safe? eric
- Re: Opening up ports 139, 1494, 1604 - Am I safe? Steven Smith
- Re: Opening up ports 139, 1494, 1604 - Am I safe? infosec
- Opening up ports 139, 1494, 1604 - Am I safe? SGriffin
- Re: Opening up ports 139, 1494, 1604 - Am I sa... D Clyde Williamson
- Re: Opening up ports 139, 1494, 1604 - Am I safe? SGriffin
- Re: Opening up ports 139, 1494, 1604 - Am I sa... D Clyde Williamson
- Re: Opening up ports 139, 1494, 1604 - Am I sa... Matt Curtin
- Re: Opening up ports 139, 1494, 1604 - Am I sa... parks
