Microsoft Bulletin Q176466: XGEN: TCP Ports and Microsoft Exchange:
In-depth Discussion
In addition: Check out http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/exc10.asp
/hope this helps
/mark
At 10:28 AM 7/13/00 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>To date, there aren't any known vulnerabilities to the Exchange-SMTP
>gateway. That does not however, mitigate the other obvious problems with
>mail based attacked including using Exchange as a spam relay, active
>content attacks (ala ILOVEYOU), HTTP formatted mail attacks, virus
>infected attachments, flooding the server, DoS attacks, etc. Keep the big
>picture.
>
>Bill Stackpole, CISSP
>
>
>
>"Yaniv Fine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>07/13/00 08:48 AM
>Please respond to yanivf
>
> To: "Firewalls LIST \(E-mail\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc:
> Subject: static nat
>
>Hi all
>
>We are using check point FW-1 and thinking of installing Exchange server
>with Static Nat
>What are the risks we are taking in this scenario .
>Should I thinks on a tighter security strategy but more expensive
>Any pointers are welcome
>
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Yaniv Fine
>MIS Manager
>Know-Net Group
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>-
>[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
>"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
