i heard (from cisco) the PIX won't pass multicast, but will in
the future.
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000, Fabio Pietrosanti wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> hi, i'm configuring a pix on which i have dmz users that need to access
> via multicast to inside .
> so, they give me that ip of multicast 224.1.1.1/udp/port=1234 .
>
> it's possible to do that
>
> static (inside,dmz) 224.0.0.1 224.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
> static (inside,dmz) 224.0.0.2 224.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
> static (inside,dmz) 224.1.1.1 224.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
>
> conduit permit udp host 224.0.0.1 any any
> conduit permit udp host 224.0.0.2 any any
> conduit permit udp host 224.1.1.1 1234 any
>
> ?
>
> i use 224.0.0.1 and 224.0.0.2 cause of all multicast capable host and all
> mrouter.
>
> does anyone has suggestion on how to do that ?
>
>
> Pietrosanti Fabio I.NET SpA, High Quality Access to the Internet
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Direzione Tecnica, Gruppo Firewall )
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> PGP Key (DSS) http://naif.itapac.net/naif.asc
>
> Home Page URL: http://www.inet.it
> Sede: Via Caldera, 21 20153 Milano
> Tel: 02-409061 Fax: 02-40906303
> --
> Free advertising: www.openbsd.org - Multiplatform Ultra-secure OS
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
> Filter: gpg4pine 4.1 (http://azzie.robotics.net)
>
> iD8DBQE5gZTOdK5I1NnlcMYRAjL8AJ9l/OpyQjI1Yh5S0Mzc/99WO+vmBQCaAkde
> 7h5jXHSqmKxkqeKq/oOnrXQ=
> =nznb
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
