Thanks Ola for your reply but i think this not fill our requerements.

We have 2 NICs over firewall and a router on same subnet. To begin i want to
be accesible DMZ and noDMZ host from both sides and implement the rules to
limit that access later. Can i to implement this with arp?. Must i to divide
my subnet in two and implement IP forward?.

I have probe the Ola Samuelson suggest although this is no valid for me
because i want that all the host can see between them. In any case the
commands:

arp -s x.x.x.3 MAC_address_of_NIC_at_x.x.53.4 pub
arp -s x.x.x.4 MAC_address_of_NIC_at_x.x.53.4 pub

don't seem to help me to see (with pings) DMZ hosts to no DMZ. My NICs
configuration are the following:

Network 0 (ifcfg-eth0) (external):
DEVICE=eth0
BOOTPROTO=static
IPADDR=x.x.x.3
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
NETWORK=x.x.x.0
BROADCAST=x.x.x.255
GATEWAY=x.x.x.1
ONBOOT=yes

Network 1 (ifcfg-eth1) (internal LAN):
DEVICE=eth1
BOOTPROTO=static
IPADDR=x.x.x.4
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
NETWORK=x.x.x.0
BROADCAST=x.x.x.255
ONBOOT=yes

and the arp -an after commands:

? (x.x.x.3) at * PERM PUP on eth1
? (x.x.x.4) at * PERM PUP on eth1

Thanks for your time.
Guillermo.

----- Original Message -----
From: Ola Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Guillermo G�mez Valc�rcel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: Firewalling with 2 NIC�s over a public class C network


> Hi!
> If this is want You want to do, some ideas .....
>
> Did this once before.
> FW with 3 nics and a router.
> 2 NICs and router on same subnet.
> Proxy arp makes it work.
>
> Proxy arp is needed if they are on the same logical net but different
NICs.
> You may use the exactly same netmask and such for all nets.
>
> Something like this(not sure off hand) on the firewall machine:
> arp -s x.x.53.2 MAC_address_of_NIC_at_x.x.53.3 pub
> arp -s x.x.53.3 MAC_address_of_NIC_at_x.x.53.3 pub
>
> This solves following:
> * Coming in on external IF and finding DMZ IF(net) via the MAC-address of
the
> External IF.
>
> Does not solve follwing:
> *  Forwarding, routing etc BUT now it CAN work
>
> Hint:
> * I would use newer/other dist than 5.1 or reinstall new kernel/packages.
For
> security reasons,
>   new features, ease of administration and stability. All of these are
important
> if You want to build a firewall.
>
> Hope I remember all this correctly..... :-)
>
>
> HTH
> file://OLAS
>
>
>
>

-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

Reply via email to