On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Henry Sieff wrote: > Keep in mind that the source port on the queries MAY be anything > greater than 1023, depending on the querying machines implementation. It also may be 53, as that was at one time "normal" behaviour and many people set up filter rules and nameservers to reflect that. Paul ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions [EMAIL PROTECTED] which may have no basis whatsoever in fact." - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- Re: Ports for DNS Bernd Eckenfels
- Re: Ports for DNS Brian Kifiak
- Re: Ports for DNS Paul D. Robertson
- Re: Ports for DNS Brian Kifiak
- Re: Ports for DNS Paul D. Robertson
- Re: Ports for DNS mouss
- RE: Ports for DNS Vincent de Lau
- RE: Ports for DNS Ingram, Richard
- RE: Ports for DNS Paul D. Robertson
- RE: Ports for DNS Henry Sieff
- RE: Ports for DNS Paul D. Robertson
- RE: Ports for DNS Steve Smith
- Re: Ports for DNS Jeffery . Gieser
- RE: Ports for DNS Vincent de Lau
- RE: Ports for DNS Jeffery . Gieser
- RE: Ports for DNS Noonan, Wesley
- Re: Ports for DNS Volker Tanger
- RE: Ports for DNS Michael Nelson
- RE: Ports for DNS Henry Sieff
- RE: Ports for DNS "Marx, J�rg"
- RE: Ports for DNS Noonan, Wesley
