Or....

What happens if some other usefull software needs these ports for some
reason ? Not that it's much of an answer, but port blocking allways leaves
you with a thought of what needs what now.

And that will work so long as Napster doesn't change the port settings,
which is possible indeed.

If you really want to go mad, take a look at Odigo. The new version not only
does full "any" port scanning to get out, but also allows email dld, file
transfers from user to user, full chat, and all on scanning ports.

Their support refuses to assist in this.

So far, I'v been unable to block it in any form or shape.

Any ideas ?

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Olsson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: � ������ 23 2000 11:22
> To:   Young, Beth A.
> Cc:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      Re: Napter traffic pattern
> 
> Why don't you just block the TCP-ports used by Napster? Denying traffic
> to/from ports 6699 and 8888 ought to do the trick. Or?
> 
> //Robert
> 
> "Young, Beth A." wrote:
> > 
> > The white paper is not done (too many other projects right now to finish
> it)
> > but here is the gist of the traffic patterns.  Since I got enough
> off-list
> > email expressing interest, it seems appropriate to post it here.
> > 
> > I used a router to block incoming SYN packets to my IP address which
> blocked
> > napster traffic from my machine until I changed the client setting to "I
> > live behind the firewall."  At that point, people started downloading
> from
> > me again because my client would initiate the SYN.  It also doesn't do
> any
> > good to block the napster subnet range.  While that works 95% of the
> time,
> > there are other napster servers out there that do not live in the
> napster
> > 64.124.41.0 network.
> > 
> > A co-worker is looking at Packet Pup as a way to block napster but we
> are
> > kind of unique in that we don't care if students download files but we
> don't
> > want to be the main supplier of songs so we want to block downloads from
> us.
> > *shugs* any suggestion on that front would appreciated.
> > 
> > -Beth
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

Reply via email to