No, No, firewalls are supposed to allow proprietary protocols through it. /mark At 03:00 PM 12/4/00 -0500, Paul D. Robertson wrote: >On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Al Potter wrote: > > > with. Why anyone would spec a protocol like this these days is beyond me. > >Because idiots will open firewalls instead of batting the application >designer about the head with a clue-by-four. I can't count the number of >idiotic vendors I've sent packing due to idiotic protocol design. > >Paul >----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions >[EMAIL PROTECTED] which may have no basis whatsoever in fact." > PSB#9280 > >- >[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with >"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.] - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- Corba application using random ports Murugavel Balasubramaniam
- Re: Corba application using random ports Samir Fahim
- Re: Corba application using random port... Al Potter
- Re: Corba application using random ... Paul D. Robertson
- Re: Corba application using ran... Samir Fahim
- Re: Corba application usin... Paul D. Robertson
- Re: Corba application ... Samir Fahim
- Re: Corba applicat... Paul D. Robertson
- Re: Corba application using ran... Samir Fahim
- Re: Corba application using ran... mark . teicher
- Re: Corba application usin... Ron DuFresne
- Re: Corba application using random ports Brian Ford
- Re: Re: Corba application using random port... Murugavel Balasubramaniam
- RE: Corba application using random ports william.wells
- RE: Corba application using random port... Paul D. Robertson
- Re: Corba application using random port... Al Potter
- Re: Corba application using random ports Rex Sanders
- RE: Corba application using random ports Ng, Kenneth \(US\)
- RE: Corba application using random port... Paul D. Robertson
