I went to the one in florida at the beginning of the year and was very
unimpressed with it compared to the various usenix confrences. It costs
quite a bit more, and the classes seemed much to basic (the final straw
was the class showing what tools script kiddies have and how they work
that spent 15 min on winnuke, 5+ on showing the different GUIs that it has
sported, why in the world would any security person care what the GUI
looks like, let alone the 5-10 different version of the GUI it has had)

I did luck out and found a couple classes that were worthwhile. If you get
the advanced classes they can be useful, but if you make the mistake of
taking an entire track or one of the lower classes you should save your
money.

David Lang


 On
Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Paul D. Robertson wrote:

> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 09:59:48 -0500 (EST)
> From: Paul D. Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jeff Deitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Kathy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: SANS hype and auto-fix virus
> 
> On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Jeff Deitz wrote:
> 
> > Just my experience with SANS. I did attend one SANS conference a couple of
> > years back on intrusion detection and thought that it was great, but it now
> > seems they are now trying to teach more of the basics, geared towards their
> > certification program, then advance or in-depth knowledge on the subjects. 
>  
> It's been a couple of years since I went to one also, so it may be that
> it's changed for the worst.  Some people I know went to the last one in DC
> and found it to be very good though.  AFAIK all they picked was the
> advanced stuff. 
> 
> Paul
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Paul D. Robertson      "My statements in this message are personal opinions
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]      which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
> 
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
> 
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

Reply via email to