[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> At the very least they should be checking execution path! c:\Program 
> Files\Internet Exploder\iexplore.exe should be allowed, while 
> c:\temp\iexplore.exe should be recognized as a seperate application. If 

Yes, that would be good, though an application that wasn't running could still be 
replaced, thus managing to circumvent the firewall.

> windows will not report the execution path somehow (Which I would have 
> trouble believing, even from microsoft) then yes, they should checksum. 
> 
> It's a reasonable approach.

See my message just sent to the list & Chris Hastings - where do you store the 
checksums?

> The sad part is that under NT or Windows 2000 your virus scanning 
> choices are somewhat ridiculous. The only program I've been able to 
> live 
> with for any length of time is AVP, but I can't leave it running 
> because 
> it slows the system down so dramatically if it's in live mode, where it 
> 
> does the most good. Mostly, I just don't run outlook :)

I use Sophos Intercheck, and don't have any real performance problems on my rather 
outdated machine. The only problem I have is when I'm trying to deal with samples of 
live viruses... And like you, I certainly don't run outlook, or any other 
java/activeX/whatever enabled mail client.

> Then again, in a corporate environment, the best thing to do (sadly!) 
> may be to force the users to have the virus software running, via 
> diabolical microsoft support tools if necessary, and take away certain 
> of their rights by default, handle all traffic via proxies, et cetera. 
> At least this way you know they're doing the right thing.

In a corporate network, you pretty much have to do things like this - when things go 
wrong, it's the time of people on this list that will be wasted, so we have to do 
everything we can. I don't think demanding that people run A/V software is excessive!

Mike

----
Michael Owen
IT Security Engineer
NET-TEL Computer Systems Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

Reply via email to