As the maintainer of stunnel.org, your subject line raised my eyebrows.
It took me a second to realize that you were saying your post triggered
the 'sexual discrimination' response. I thought you meant somehow
I, or stunnel.org was at fault. Whew.
I have a theory:
> ------- original msg posted to firewalls..
>
> Subject: Re: SSL and other protocol usage
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 20:53:28 -0800
>
> you should perhaps take a look at..
>
> Stunnel -- Universal SSL Wrapper
> http://www.stunnel.org/
>
Lots of the porn spam I receive starts with 'You should look at'
or 'Check this out' or 'take a look at my new site', etc.
Maybe they're filtering based on that.
True, it's a good canditate to procmail it into the potential spam
box, but hardly reliable enough to deny passing the email along to
the user. Wow.
> Well, shucks, I had no idea I might be somehow making any kind of innuendo or
> whatever, but this here "administrator" named "scanmail" has apparently seen
> fit to "quarantine" my (innocent) message on the basis of "Sexual
> Discrimination".
If you reverse the letters 'stunnel' you get 'lennuts' -- maybe
you were making some lewd statement after all. Now we just need
to find Len, and determine why we're talking about his body parts.
I'm going to go now. Can't wait until I get my email returned to me...
--
Brian Hatch Since light travels faster
Systems and than sound, some people
Security Engineer appear bright until you
http://www.ifokr.org/bri/ hear them speak.
Every message PGP signed
PGP signature
