This doesn't make any sense to me. "Sexual Discrimination" != porn sites. I beg to differ with the definitions Trend SMEX[1] used here. Nancy Davis [1] I wonder if SMEX will trigger something. I mean *clearly* thats SEX encoded, right? Forwarded message: > Looks like the mail scanner mistook the URL > for a porn site and it also looks like > the mail scanner can't distinguish between > ".org" and ".com". > -Kevin > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 12:02 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: fyi: stunnel.org implies "Sexual Discrimination" ?? > > > Well, shucks, I had no idea I might be somehow making any kind of innuendo > or > whatever, but this here "administrator" named "scanmail" has apparently seen > > fit to "quarantine" my (innocent) message on the basis of "Sexual > Discrimination". > > I'm tossing this into the ring here in a simple spirit of > consciousness-raising -- programmatic semantic interpretation of human > communication, such as this, both illustrates and raises a host of > technological and social issues. > > Its ever more obvious to me that when evaluating an employer, a key > consideration (for myself that is) is the social aspects of their security > policies and practices. I would not want to have my communications filtered > in > such a fashion (or at all). > > I'm a newbie to this particular list, and I suspect that this list isn't > necessarily the appropriate place to discuss the social implications of this > > sort of technology. Does anyone know of a more appropriate list for that? > > thanks, > > JeffH > > ps: there are "newsletter" lists, as opposed to discussion lists, where the > author(s) expound on such topics, i.e. on the social implications of > networked > computing and such. A prominent (imho) one is the Red Rock Eater News > Service, > an archive of which is available here.. > > http://commons.somewhere.com/rre/ > > ------- Forwarded Messages > > From: System Attendant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: ScanMail Message: To Sender, sensitive content found and action t > aken. > Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 23:55:51 -0500 > > Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content. > > Place = [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ; ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject = Re: SSL and other protocol usage > Delivery Time = December 13, 2000 (Wednesday) 22:55:47 > Policy = Sexual Discrimination > Action on this mail = Quarantine message > > Warning message from administrator: > Notice: A message you sent appears to have violated GE Financial Assurance > email policies for inappropriate language or content and may not have been > received by the recipient. > > > ------- original msg posted to firewalls.. > > Subject: Re: SSL and other protocol usage > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 20:53:28 -0800 > > you should perhaps take a look at.. > > Stunnel -- Universal SSL Wrapper > http://www.stunnel.org/ > > > JeffH > > > ------- End of Forwarded Messages > > > > - > [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.] > - > [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.] > - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
