We are currently attempting some NAT on a CISCO router but the following
error keeps occurring;

Description of Fault:

Basically, the Network Address Translation is functioning correctly,
however when communication is established between our network, and the
third party network,
every second packet is dropped.  This occurs because the gateway address on
the second packet is changed to the destination address instead of the next
hop
address.  Below is a copy of the debug output from the router, with debug
ip nat, and debug ip packet.


Dec  4 02:20:32: NAT*: s=10.0.20.20->165.67.60.81, d=165.67.60.65 [28693]
Dec  4 02:20:32: NAT*: s=165.67.60.81, d=165.67.60.65->10.12.10.15 [28693]
Dec  4 02:20:33: NAT: s=10.12.10.15->165.67.60.65, d=165.67.60.81 [38251]
Dec  4 02:20:33: NAT: s=165.67.60.65, d=165.67.60.81->10.0.20.20 [38251]

Dec  4 02:20:33: IP: s=165.67.60.65 (Serial0/0.200), d=10.0.20.20
(Ethernet0/0),  g=10.0.205.1, len 60, forward

Dec  4 02:20:33: NAT*: s=10.0.20.20->165.67.60.81, d=165.67.60.65 [29717]
Dec  4 02:20:33: NAT*: s=165.67.60.81, d=165.67.60.65->10.12.10.15 [29717]
Dec  4 02:20:34: NAT: s=10.12.10.15->165.67.60.65, d=165.67.60.81 [38252]
Dec  4 02:20:34: NAT: s=165.67.60.65, d=165.67.60.81->10.0.20.20 [38252]

Dec  4 02:20:34: IP: s=165.67.60.65 (Serial0/0.200), d=10.0.20.20
(Ethernet0/0),  g=10.0.20.20, len 60, forward
Dec  4 02:20:34: IP: s=165.67.60.65 (Serial0/0.200), d=10.0.20.20
(Ethernet0/0), len 60, encapsulation failed


As can be seen, in the first instance the gateway address is 10.0.205.1, in
the second instance the gateway address is the same
as the destination address 10.0.20.20.

This problem is consistent in that every second packet fails.

We have tried the following to fix it;

Since then we have had the following recommendations:

Turn off the route caching
Change the command

ip route 165.67.60.80 255.255.255.240 ethernet0

to

ip route 165.67.60.80 255.255.255.240 10.0.205.1

We have been recommended to upgrade the IOS to 12.1 or greater,
unfortunately this requires a RAM upgrade which
we are not prepared to do with assurances that this will resolve the
problem.


Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

John Taylor







-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]

Reply via email to