David,
I guess it is all who you ask. I know people that only use RH, but other use Caldera.
I have used RH and
FreeBSD. One of the things that I like about FreeBSD is that it is more like a Unix.
It is also more secure
with things like FTP, Telnet and the like. Now Caldera is one that I have heard has a
really clean install
and interface to it. So it all depends on what you are trying to do. Which ever
version you choise make
sure that it is the one you stay with. It is not good to jump back and forth between
ver. It will just get your more
confused. Well at least with me.<G>
Good luck on your decision, I can bet you will get a few other comments from the list..
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 1/31/2001 at 18:48 David Shoon-Yew Ng wrote:
>Dear all,
> I have a question regarding Linux/UNIX in general. I am starting to learn
>UNIX/Linux but want to focus on one particular area. Which particular
>version is better - RedHat/Caldera/TurboLinux/Corel etc ... it seems there
>are so many versions that it might just be better running SUN Solaris 8
>(Proper UNIX)on Intel platform instead? Which particular version/type is
>used commercially nowadays (on Intel platform) and which is more popular in
>general for Servers/Server based application etc ... Please advise ...
> Thanks in advance ...
>
>
>Sincerely,
>
>
>
>
>David Ng
>
>-
>[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
>"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
