"Wimmer, Neil T." wrote:
>
> I was wondering what other people's experience has been with Rainfinity's
> Rainwall product. We chose it at the time because it could handle more then
> two interfaces on a firewall. We tried implementing version 1.5 and seem to
> be having problems making it work with NAT. They have acknowledged a bug
> they're working on now. Today I know both Cisco's Arrowpoint and Foundry
BTW, some CISCO guys over there sometime boasted to me about their
"incredibly reliable and secure embedded software", so no break-ins
could be available...
Well. Just have to check
http://interactiveinfosec.com/?openMenus=-1+10+60&selectedIndex=62
> Network's ServerIron is suppossed to do more then two interfaces. Does
> anyone have experience and comments on either Cisco or Foundry's solution?
Nope, but if your firewall is FW-1, Raptor or Gauntlet, another
choice is StoneSoft's FullCluster: www.stonebeat.com , www.stonesoft.com -
Their last version is quite good and stable. Check it out.
Regards.
--
Martin Humberto Hoz Salvador
Information Security Consultant (ISS ICU, Check Point CCSE)
C I T I
Sendero Sur 285 Col. Contry, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon 64860, MEXICO
Phone: +(52)(8) 357-2267 x139 Fax: +(52)(8) 357-8047
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.citi.com.mx
PGPKey ID: 0x0454E8D9 ICQ Number: 31631540
GIT d- s:(+:+) a-- C+(++++)>$ SILH++++ P++ L+++ E W++ N+ o-- K- w
O M V PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP++ t 5 X+ R tv- b+ DI+ D++ G++ e++ h-- r+ y++
"The software said it requires Windows 95 or *better*, so I installed
GNU/Linux"
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
