If you mean like --
<Internet Router>-<Firewall>
|
+-------- <DMZ>
|
+-------- <Inside>
Yes.
-mike
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Joseph Bannon wrote:
> > The higher sec levels can communicate to lower sec levels using their
> > untranslated addresses by doing something like the following:
> >
> > static (inside,dmz) 172.16.0.0 172.16.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0 0 0
>
> So this will allow me to only use one router?
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- To NAT or not to NAT in the DMZ, that is the question. Jim Johnson
- RE: To NAT or not to NAT in the DMZ, that is the quest... Ben Nagy
- RE: To NAT or not to NAT in the DMZ, that is the q... Joseph Bannon
- RE: To NAT or not to NAT in the DMZ, that is t... Michael Nelson
- RE: To NAT or not to NAT in the DMZ, that ... Joseph Bannon
- RE: To NAT or not to NAT in the DMZ, ... Michael Nelson
- RE: To NAT or not to NAT in the D... Joseph Bannon
- RE: PIX Firewall (was: nat) Joseph Bannon
- RE: To NAT or not to NAT in the DMZ, that is the quest... Jim Johnson
- RE: To NAT or not to NAT in the DMZ, that is the quest... Ben Nagy
