Hi all, Since the range of private network addr is already officially documented as 192.168.x.x, 10.x.x.x, and so on, it is no longer a secret to external hackers. Does NAT really help to hide/secure the internal network? Or it is just purely a method to help easing the pain of having not enough of public IP addr? Your opinion appreciated. Thanks. - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- Re: To NAT or not to NAT? Ju Kong Fui
- Re: To NAT or not to NAT? mouss
- Re: To NAT or not to NAT? Gaute Gullesen
- Re: To NAT or not to NAT? Anthony Teelucksingh
- Re: To NAT or not to NAT? mouss
- Re: To NAT or not to NAT? Jose Nazario
- RE: To NAT or not to NAT? Reckhard, Tobias
- RE: To NAT or not to NAT? Ben Nagy
- RE: To NAT or not to NAT? Reckhard, Tobias
- RE: To NAT or not to NAT? Ben Nagy
