I agree 100%. Who said that the information crime is something
that is dangerous? I have read more then one story that business
are hiring ex hackers for their business to help with security issues.
Who better to know if there is a security hole, but for someone to
that has been in to play (Defeat) with them...
If they can pass a background, and the like I have no problem with it.
Now they might have a little shorter leash then someone that has not
been convicted. That would also only be until they proved themselves.
I could bet they would be a better employee then someone that has not
been into the system.
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 3/10/2001 at 13:56 Gaute Gullesen wrote:
>On Saturday, March 10, 2001, 3:56:31 AM, mht wrote:
>> Why would anyone want to hire someone who has actually been
>> convicted/charged with an Information Security crime. It seems if they
>> were smart enough to get caught they are truly not the best security
>> personnel out there. Even testifying in front of Congress using one's
>> hacker nom de plume doesn't help one's career either, although there has
>> been notable exceptions over the last couple of years -:)
>
>i prefer judging people myself when it comes to who i'm gonna trust.
>giving your authorities that power is just scary!
>
>================================================================
> Gaute Gullesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> phone: +47 922 48 107
> Fingerprint: AF90 7B96 9835 AA26 4DCC D4F7 1B82 110C B5DF 00B1
> Support the antiSecurity movement!: http://anti.security.is/
>================================================================
>
>
>-
>[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
>"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
