Jim, Using your wall safe analogy. It is not the wall safe, itself, that is illegal. It would be the shotgun in the wall safe that goes off when someone opens up the wall safe that is illegal. This has been tried in court. Housebreakers that are hurt by traps set up in non-primary dwellings can sue the owner of that dwelling for damages. Unless, of course, you kill the housebreaker=) If I set up a honeypot that does nothing but record stuff then I am probably not breaking the law but if I have the honeypot trigger something that affects the hacker then that may be illegal. I'm not a lawyer but I also wonder how enticement falls into this. Regards, Jeffery Gieser - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
- HoneyPots: "legal or nor legal" Mr. Firewaller
- Re: HoneyPots: "legal or nor legal" Michael Galloway
- Re: HoneyPots: "legal or nor legal" Michael Francis
- Re: HoneyPots: "legal or nor legal"... Casper Boden-Cummins
- Re: HoneyPots: "legal or nor legal&... Casper Boden-Cummins
- RE: HoneyPots: "legal or nor legal" Jim Kearney
- RE: HoneyPots: "legal or nor legal" Jeffery . Gieser
- RE: HoneyPots: "legal or nor legal" Darich Runyan
- Re: HoneyPots: "legal or nor legal"... Michael T. Babcock
- Re: HoneyPots: "legal or nor legal&... Jose Nazario
- Re: HoneyPots: "legal or nor le... Michael H. Warfield
- Re: HoneyPots: "legal or n... Daniel Harrison
- Re[2]: HoneyPots: "legal or nor leg... Kevin
- RE: HoneyPots: "legal or nor legal" Len Conrad
- RE: HoneyPots: "legal or nor legal" Ng, Kenneth \(US\)
- RE: HoneyPots: "legal or nor legal" Gibson, Brian
- Re[2]: HoneyPots: "legal or nor legal" Hague, Alex
