> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Mester
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 10:27 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re:Newbie Q: FW-1 vs PIX
>
> No bad article at all.
> http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2001/0312rev.html
> Once i was supposed to decide what to use for our site - so i took
> PIX.
> It has real-time secured kernel and doesn't use Unix-like
> implementations - so it was more acceptable for site configuration. If
> i
> would just need to use firewall for some department in multi-nodes
> network - that i would probably go to the FW-1. Netscreen also is
> noticeable - i worked with Netscreen10/100 boxes - really liked them.
> Hope it helps,
> Daniel.
> ------------------------------
>
> >Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 14:29:14 -0500
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Newbie Q: FW-1 vs PIX
>
> >I was wondering if anyone has knowledge about Checkpoint's Firewall-1
> vs
> >Cisco's PIX firewall products. I'm not quite as concerned with
> interface
> >features and ease of use as I am with the security features and/or
> >vulnerabilities each of these might have - especially in contrast to
> one
> >another. Can anyone help?
> >
> >THANK YOU
> >
> >Blake Logan
> >IS Audit Supervisor
> >Harcourt General, Inc
> >Orlando, FL
>
> >- -
> >[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> >unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Daniel Mester
> Portal Technologies Manager
>
>
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
