a much easier to understand and more basic to the question can be found on
....www.cisco.com..perhaps a few of you have heard of this
little router company who does a few thingsz with nat/pat...
piranha...
>From: Valerie Anne Bubb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Valerie Anne Bubb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: NAT pools
>Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 13:55:58 -0800 (PST)
>
>
>Edward -
>
>Certainly! This is, by the way, the whole point of Dynamic NAT (or
>masquerading). Some implementations will change the sequence numbers,
>or the source ports to force them to be unique. Others just trust
>that source ports are generally random enough (combined with dst IP
>and dst port) to tell the connections apart. By these methods, you
>can have many clients (private/unregistered IPs) and only one or a few
>public/registered IP addresses.
>
>To learn a lot more about general NAT and some vendor specific
>stuff, check out this web site:
>
>http://www.uq.net.au/~zzdmacka/the-nat-page/
>
>excellent and very thorough.
>
>Valerie
>
>
>
> > From: "Edward Ingram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: NAT pools
> > Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 12:38:16 -0800
> >
> > What happens if the numbers of clients exceeds the number of IPs
>allocated
>within a NAT pool? Will it reuse IPs already given out or will clients be
>denied access. Does this depend on the firewall being used or is it a
>general
>concept?
> >
> >
>
>
>-
>[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
>"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
