n Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Truman Boyes wrote: >any reason you choose http-gw over squid ? You could do authentication thru squid (ncsa-auth) and then forward the requests to http-gw. You still benefit of the caching feature of squid and improve security by content filtering of the http-gw (activeX and so on..). Have a look at the readme/faq of squid. It is well described how to do this. Cheers, Phibo > >cheers, >.truman.boyes. >-------------- >Experience is the one thing you get, right after you need it > >On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, lfmaillist wrote: > >> I want to use authentication in http-gw,but I have found it is very difficult: >> many connections through the http-gw have a open-request-reponse-close mode,so >the authentication becomes difficult. >> I have some methods to the problem,but they introduce some security holes.And >> I have no any other idea for the problem.So I will be appreciative for your help. >Thanks. >> >> >> >> ----------------------------------------- >> �������£��ḻ��ʣ�������־��������͡� >> http://ecard.etang.com/progt/index.asp?s1=1&s2=1 >> ������ѵ����ʼ����������� >> http://mail.etang.com/rules.htm >> - >> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with >> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.] >> > >- >[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with >"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.] - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
