YES
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 3/29/2001 at 11:21 Kevin wrote:
>Is your dsl really that fast that your slowest machine cant handle it?
>Also I've never heard anyone saying to use a slow machine so as to
>deter or hamper an intruder. I thought it was more of a why pay more
>if you dont need it type of deal.
>
>--
>Kevin - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>-- Original message --
>
>
>> Mouss,
>
>> Very well stated. I think you make a very valid point on this.
>
>> Steven
>
>> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>
>> On 3/29/2001 at 15:37 mouss wrote:
>
>>>At 12:38 29/03/01 +1000, Andrew Raphael wrote:
>>>>Use your slowest, smallest spare machine to run GNATBox Light from
>>>>www.gnatbox.com and protect your DSL network immediately. It's free,
>>>>supports 5 clients, and needs just 2 NIC cards and a floppy drive.
>>>>Then you can take your time evaluating the other suggestions on this
>>>>thread.
>>>
>>>I will certainly not use a slow machine as a FW since that would slow my own
>>>network:) The fact that that would slow an intruder is of no use to me.
>>>intruders
>>>have all their time, but not me!
>>>I know that tis has been advocated by many respected people, and I respect
>>>them,
>>>but I don't share this opinion.
>>>
>>>A real example would be for a country to destroy all its highways, roads,
>>>railraods,
>>>... so that if an ennemy gets in, he will find it hard to move. the problem
>>>is that not only
>>>is this ineffective (if the ennemy comes in, he can afford to suffer since
>>>he is gaining
>>>enough), but bad for the country itself.
>>> the art of bore, mouss
>>>
>>>cheers,
>>>mouss
>>>
>>>-
>>>[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
>>>"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>
>
>
>> -
>> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
>> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
