Hello again group!
Just a quick call..
I am soon purchasing an e-commerce solution and
the favoured choice is access dimensions/horizons.
Does anybody know any security issues with this
product?
If not, is there a good website/newsgroup that
could help me discover the holes in this product?
Thanks for all your help ppl, in the future & the past
Kind Regards
Gary Jones
--- Firewalls-Digest
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Firewalls-Digest Saturday, April 28 2001
> Volume 08 : Number 1621
>
>
>
> In this issue:
>
> Xwindows on PIX
> Re: Firewalls-Digest V8 #1620
> ip address to hexadecimal converter
> RE: ip address to hexadecimal converter
> RE: ip address to hexadecimal converter
> SonicWALL SOHO2 vs Netopia 910 vs NetScreen
> 5
> RE: Xwindows on PIX
> Re: Linux Firewalls (WAS: Looking for...)
> RE: Rookie Question About Firewalls
> RE: Xwindows on PIX
> Re: SonicWALL SOHO2 vs Netopia 910 vs
> NetScreen 5
> RE: SonicWALL SOHO2 vs Netopia 910 vs
> NetScreen 5
> IP & Netmask Calculation
> Re: SonicWALL SOHO2 vs Netopia 910 vs
> NetScreen 5
> RE: IP & Netmask Calculation
> Re: SonicWALL SOHO2 vs Netopia 910 vs
> NetScreen 5
> hi
>
> See the end of the digest for information on
> subscribing to the Firewalls
> or Firewalls-Digest mailing lists and on how to
> retrieve back issues.
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 06:44:44 -0700
> From: Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Xwindows on PIX
>
> I'm having a problem with Xwindows timing out. When
> someone comes in from
> the outside via telnet and then starts an X11
> session on a server. They
> work for an hour and then time out, the default time
> out for the PIX. The
> problem is that the telnet session that started the
> x session get's no
> activity and when the pix times it out it also kills
> the X session.
>
> I ran into this problem a few years ago on a
> Checkpoint firewall and turned
> of a time out parameter that was global to the whole
> firewall. That didn't
> matter since it was in a lab environment.
>
> I'm a newbie on the PIX and never got past
> semi-newbie (I have a patten on
> that word along with the gene that makes
> presidential idiots)on the check
> point with a large lag in between, so you'll have to
> speak a little slower
> than normal :-)
>
> Thanks
>
> Roy
>
> - -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 10:18:12 -0400
> From: Brian Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Firewalls-Digest V8 #1620
>
> Folks,
>
> In PIX v 6.0 Cisco introduces the concept of full
> bi-directional NAT. Put
> a PIX between two internetworks that have
> overlapping address domains and
> you can NAT specific resources in either direction.
>
> If you use alias you would also need to conduit to
> work around ASA. It can
> be done, but bi directional NAT is cleaner.
>
> Regards,
>
> Brian
>
> At 04:40 AM 4/27/2001 +0000, Firewalls-Digest wrote:
> >Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:00:28 -0400
> >From: Paul Gracy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: RE: PIX address translation in multiple
> directions
> >
> >I wonder if there is a way to accomplish this via
> the 'alias' command in PIX
> >IOS. I've only been sort of following this thread,
> so I don't know for
> >sure. Also, you might be able to cheat by putting
> a screening router inside
> >the PIX on one side and using it for NAT .....
> >
> >network 82 - router translates that to network 92 -
> pix - network 102
> >
> >The PIX now only has to NAT the 102, not the 92
> since it's already NAT'd by
> >the router. Sort of a square peg / big hammer
> approach, but...
> >
> >- -----Original Message-----
> >From: Carson Gaspar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 5:31 PM
> >To: Whelpley, Corey;
> '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: PIX address translation in multiple
> directions
> >
> >
> >The ability you want is what some vendors call
> "illegal NAT". It is most
> >commonly used to handle the case where 2 companies
> are using the same
> >reserved address space, and each needs to be NAT'd
> into some neutral space
> >to the other.
> >
> >To the best of my knowledge, the PIX does _not_
> have a means of doing this,
> >at least in 5.3(1). If I'm wrong, please let me
> know, as this would be a
> >very useful feature.
> >
> >- --
> >Carson Gaspar - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Queen trapped in a butch body
> >- -
> >[To unsubscribe, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> >"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the
> message.]
> >- -
> >[To unsubscribe, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> >"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the
> message.]
>
> - -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 07:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "It's The Zoooomer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: ip address to hexadecimal converter
>
> Is there anyone out there that has a little tools
> that
> converts an ip address to hexadecimal...?
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great
> prices
> http://auctions.yahoo.com/
> - -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 10:04:40 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: ip address to hexadecimal converter
>
> - --openmail-part-1728b4d1-00000001
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Disposition: inline
> ;Creation-Date="Fri, 27 Apr 2001 10:04:40 -0500"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> there is a little tool I use called "IP subnet calc"
> that will do
> conversions. The contact address is
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
