I think that the two is correct. As Jonas told, the most important security tool is the security responsible(s) mind(s). But, as in programming languages, you may have to work/pay more or less, if you begin with one or other OS. IMHO we need to think about three things. The first is about the implementors experience. the second is about your machines possibility and the third is about your commercial history or deals. But also important is to educated the users to be affraid about securety in your network! Helmut Springer wrote: > On Mon 2001-05-07 (11:19), Eric Johnson wrote: > > I'm running OpenBSD on one of my systems. So far, no problems > > have been noticed. > > Did you notice nothing by expert monitoring while dozens of capable > people are attacking, or did you notice nothing by not knowing what > to look for and noone trying anything anyway? > > I know a lot of sites featuring the latter, and the former is what > Jonas told... > > -- > MfG/Best Regards, helmut springer Was ist Ihre groesste Tugend? > Mein warmer, menschenfreundlicher Humor. > HRK > - > [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.] - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
