THe loading for a realsecure network sensor is very high.
THis is because of the way the sensor deals with the traffic. Rather than
putting it throught the normal IP stack, RS NS creates its own stack.
You're looking at something along the lines of 70% resource utilisation like
this.
Hence the rec not to run the sensor on the same machine as the firewall.
Regards
Simon Kellow
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Fredy Santana
Sent: 20 June 2001 13:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Real Secure and Firewall-1
Hi:
I'm looking for experiences on install a Real Secure Network sensor in the
same machine than a Firewall-1. Well I know this is not recomended but I
think if the perfomance requirements are not high could work.
Does anyone had made this??
Regards from Chile
Saludos
Fredy R. Santana V.
Ingeniero Civil El�ctrico - CCSA
Orion 2000 - Servicios Profesionales en Seguridad Inform�tica
La Concepcion 322 piso 12, Providencia.
Santiago, Chile
Fono: 56-2-6403944, Fax: 56-2-6403990
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.orion.cl
_______________________________________________
Firewalls mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
_______________________________________________
Firewalls mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnac.net/mailman/listinfo/firewalls
